Buried for baiting anonymous with speculative garbage.
It would all be underground. It is much more effecient and less power is lost. Welcome to 1999.
Talk about makin' that Madden cover look awkward... HE'S DOOMED! DOOMED, I TELL YA! DOOMED! university on line
..is it bad that that's the same day as my birthday? =/
Oh joys, more lame crap. Digg has been getting good these days.
SETI is probably just a computer data hunt by the CIA..
This guy was protecting the network!!!! He didnt comprimise it or files or anythign...he put it on lockdown to protect it....he used best pratices given the situation...WTF is up with 5 Million bail??? Murders get 1 million? He was protecting the network from people who were going to comprimise it if the passwords were "given out" I would have done the same thing. When new people come in that want access to something they know nothing about or have no business having such access what would you do? I gurantee the network will be hosed in a week if just anyone has access.
Would it be more efficient overall? You would essentially be paying a double energy 'tax': Once at the power plant to convert that coal/gas to electricity, and then again to turn the electricity into kinetic energy to move your car, whereas with gas engines you turn that gasoline directly into kinetic energy.
Think Progress just made Savage's point. We didn't even see his response and it just ended with the host saying he has special need kids.